Thursday, January 12, 2012

Asgn_3D_Class_3_DTRA RFP_2012_01_13

Read DTRA RFP X vivo Capability for Evaluation and Licensure (X.C.E.L.) Program DTRA BAA N66001-12-X-2002 Call Opportunity No. R001. Post a PCRC on the Blog

7 comments:

  1. Will Matloff
    3D/DTRA

    0. Knew: Didn't know much about this one except that previous work on living systems on a chip had been done.

    1. Learned: Requires four organs to communicate, with a primary focus on the liver, heart, and lung.

    2. Pressing?: How far can these organ systems be reduced and still be acceptable by the proposal? Also, how are these three proposals related?

    3. Presentation: Multiple cell types on chip.

    4. Thoughts: I thought that this one was the most reasonable in terms of expectations.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ayeeshik Kole
    3D/DTRA

    0. Knew: I knew DTRA sent out a call similar to DARPA. I didn't know that they were two different solicitations and how they differed.

    1. Learned: The primary focus for the DTRA proposal is the liver, heart, and lung. An additional construct will be either kidney, vasculature, or BBB w/ neuronal component. A "blood surrogate" is needed too.

    2. Pressing?: What work has been done previously towards creating a universal culture medium?

    3. Presentation: Current on-line analytic methods

    4. Thoughts: This call made the others seem overly-ambitious.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Lucas Hofmeister
    3D/DTRA
    0: Not much about DRTA or their call
    1: Learned: you get to pick between BBB+neuronal or kidney or vasculature
    2: Pressing? competition between being "user friendly" and complex enough to recapitulate the functions all of these calls are interested in
    3: Presentation: History of biological/ chemical attacks
    4: Thoughts: Seems like they want more control/involvement in the development of the platform

    ReplyDelete
  4. Zach Eagleton
    3D/DTRA

    0. Knew: Very little
    1. Learned: DTRA is similiar to the DARPA with less specifications(only 4 organs)
    2. Pressing?: What is the overlap between engineering whole organs and organs on a chip?
    3. Presentation: Current universal culture mediums
    4. Thoughts: Seems much more feasable due to the call for only 4 systems.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Asgn_3D_DTRA/Weller Emmons

    0. Knew: Only what I've learned from the other proposals

    1. Learned: That the BBB plays a major role in drug delivery.

    2. Pressing?: Are the benefits of organ on a chip that much more desirable than just using animal models

    3. Presentation: How accurate multiple organs on a chip are to the real model

    4. Thoughts: I find it particularly interesting that DTRA is focusing on the BBB

    3. Presentation:

    4. Thoughts:

    ReplyDelete
  6. Asgn_3D_DTRA/Erica Curtis

    0. Knew: I knew DTRA sent out a call for a human on a chip.

    1. Learned: I learned that they were looking for the development of a blood surrogate, preferably one that was commercially available.

    2. Pressing?: What mediums are currently available that could work as a blood surrogate? What needs to be tweaked in the formulas to achieve this?

    3. Presentation: Intricacies of the Blood Brain Barrier.

    4. Thoughts: The call seemed to be the most realistic, yet the concept could eventually be extended to more systems.

    ReplyDelete